An Evolutionary Weight Optimization Framework for Adaptive PROMETHEE-Based Decision Support Systems

Authors

  • Riki Winanjaya Information Systems, STIKOM Tunas Bangsa, Pematangsiantar, North Sumatra, Indonesia,
  • Masri Wahyuni Academy of Informatics and Computer Management, Polibisnis Academy of Informatics and Computer Management, Perdagangan, North Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i4.16860

Keywords:

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; PROMETHEE; Evolutionary Optimization; Decision Support System; Adaptive MCDM

Abstract

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods are widely employed to support complex decision processes involving multiple alternatives and conflicting evaluation criteria. However, the performance of PROMETHEE-based decision support systems is strongly influenced by the criterion weights, which are commonly predetermined and treated as fixed parameters. Such static weighting may limit the adaptability and discriminatory capability of the resulting decision model. This study proposes an Evolutionary Weight Optimization Framework for Adaptive PROMETHEE-Based Decision Support Systems to address this limitation by integrating evolutionary optimization with the PROMETHEE ranking mechanism. The proposed framework treats criterion weights as optimization variables and iteratively searches for an improved weighting configuration before generating the final PROMETHEE ranking. The experimental evaluation was conducted using a dataset comprising 219 alternatives, with the performance of the proposed optimized PROMETHEE compared against a conventional baseline PROMETHEE model using fixed criterion weights. The evaluation focused on net flow distributions, alternative ranking changes, ranking stability, and the discriminatory behavior of the decision-support models. The results demonstrate that weight optimization substantially modifies the preference structure and produces a broader and more differentiated distribution of net flow values compared with the baseline approach. Several alternatives experienced notable ranking improvements or declines, while some alternatives maintained their positions, indicating different levels of sensitivity to the optimized weighting scheme. These findings demonstrate that evolutionary weight optimization can enhance the adaptability and discriminatory capability of PROMETHEE while preserving its interpretable ranking structure. The proposed framework provides a systematic approach for developing more adaptive, robust, and data-responsive MCDM decision support systems.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, T. (2024). Comprehensive study on the selection and performance of the best electrode pair for electrocoagulation of textile wastewater using multi-criteria decision-making methods (TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE II). Journal of Environmental Management, 363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121337

Alam, T. M. (2023). A Fuzzy Inference-Based Decision Support System for Disease Diagnosis. Computer Journal, 66(9), 2169–2180. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxac068

Brcko, T. (2023). A Decision Support System Using Fuzzy Logic for Collision Avoidance in Multi-Vessel Situations at Sea. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11091819

Bregaglio, S. (2022). A public decision support system for the assessment of plant disease infection risk shared by Italian regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115365

Chen, W. (2022). Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(10), 1757–1772. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac110

Chen, Y. (2025). A Fuzzy Decision Support System for Risk Prioritization in Fine Kinney-based Occupational Risk Analysis. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda31202545

Fawaz, A. (2023). Systems Biology in Cancer Diagnosis Integrating Omics Technologies and Artificial Intelligence to Support Physician Decision Making. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13111590

Fetanat, A. (2024). Sustainability and reliability-based hydrogen technologies prioritization for decarbonization in the oil refining industry: A decision support system under single-valued neutrosophic set. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 52, 765–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.229

Funer, F. (2024). Responsibility and decision-making authority in using clinical decision support systems: An empirical-ethical exploration of German prospective professionals’ preferences and concerns. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108814

Gonzales, R. M. D. (2022). How can we use artificial intelligence for stock recommendation and risk management? A proposed decision support system. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100130

Goudarzi, A. (2024). An integrated GBWM-PROMETHEE-CLOUD & MCGP model for green supplier selection and order allocation (GSSOA) in an oil refinery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140782

Higgins, O. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based decision support systems in mental health: An integrative review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 32(4), 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13114

Huang, Z. (2023). Are physicians ready for precision antibiotic prescribing? A qualitative analysis of the acceptance of artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in India and Singapore. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 35, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2023.08.016

Kuncova, M. (2022). Two-stage weighted PROMETHEE II with results’ visualization. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 30(2), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-021-00788-9

Li, Z. (2022). An Extended PROMETHEE II Method for Multi-attribute Group Decision-Making Under q-Rung Orthopair 2-Tuple Linguistic Environment. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(7), 3039–3056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-022-01321-z

Lima, B. P. De. (2022). New hybrid AHP-QFD-PROMETHEE decision-making support method in the hesitant fuzzy environment: An application in packaging design selection. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 42(4), 2881–2897. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-201739

Meng, F. (2022). Linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE method based on similarity measure for the selection of sustainable building materials. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13(9), 4415–4435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03338-y

Mir, S. (2024). Disaster risk assessment of educational infrastructure in mountain geographies using PROMETHEE-II. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104489

Naiseh, M. (2023). How the different explanation classes impact trust calibration: The case of clinical decision support systems. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102941

Ning, M. A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Decision Support Systems for Sustainable Energy Management in Smart Cities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(9), 523–529. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150953

Oh, Y. (2023). Multi-Scale Hybrid Vision Transformer for Learning Gastric Histology: AI-Based Decision Support System for Gastric Cancer Treatment. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 27(8), 4143–4153. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2023.3276778

Ryu, H. (2023). A web-based decision support system (DSS) for hydrogen refueling station location and supply chain optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(93), 36223–36239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.064

Sotiropoulou, K. F. (2023). A Decision-Making Framework for Spatial Multicriteria Suitability Analysis using PROMETHEE II and k Nearest Neighbor Machine Learning Models. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-023-00151-3

Sufi, F. (2022). A decision support system for extracting artificial intelligence-driven insights from live twitter feeds on natural disasters. Decision Analytics Journal, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100130

T.R., M. (2024). An artificial intelligence-based decision support system for early and accurate diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease. Decision Analytics Journal, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100381

Tiwari, S. (2022). Multi-objective micro phasor measurement unit placement and performance analysis in distribution system using NSGA-II and PROMETHEE-II. Measurement Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111443

Tong, L. Z. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection for SMEs based on an extended PROMETHEE Ⅱ approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129830

Tun, H. M. (2025). Trust in Artificial Intelligence–Based Clinical Decision Support Systems Among Health Care Workers: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27. https://doi.org/10.2196/69678

Unhelkar, B. (2022). Enhancing supply chain performance using RFID technology and decision support systems in the industry 4.0–A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100084

Wardropper, C. (2022). Decision-support systems for water management. Journal of Hydrology, 610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127928

Wątróbski, J. (2023). Temporal PROMETHEE II — New multi-criteria approach to sustainable management of alternative fuels consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137445

Wayman, J. C. (2024). Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Transforming Data into Knowledge Applications of Data Based Decision Making to Improve Instructional Practice A Special Issue of the Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 295–308.

White, N. M. (2023). Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 30(6), 1205–1218. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad040

Xu, Q. (2023). Interpretability of Clinical Decision Support Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence from Technological and Medical Perspective: A Systematic Review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9919269

Yang, C. C. (2022). A Hybrid Model for Assessing the Performance of Medical Tourism: Integration of Bayesian BWM and Grey PROMETHEE-AL. Journal of Function Spaces, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5745499

Ye, J. (2022). Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets Combined with the PROMETHEE Method for the Selection of Cotton Woven Fabric. Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(16), 12447–12461. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2022.2072993

Yiğit, F. (2023). A three-stage fuzzy neutrosophic decision support system for human resources decisions in organizations. Decision Analytics Journal, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100259

Yu, D. (2023). PROMETHEE-Based Multi-AUV Threat Assessment Method Using Combinational Weights. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071422

Zorlu, K. (2023). Evaluation of nature-based tourism potential in protected and sensitive areas by CRITIC and PROMETHEE-GAIA methods. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.05.004

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Winanjaya, R., & Wahyuni , M. (2026). An Evolutionary Weight Optimization Framework for Adaptive PROMETHEE-Based Decision Support Systems. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(4), choir, 2547-2563. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i4.16860