Fairness and QoS Comparison of Equal, Max-Min, and Demand-Proportional Allocation in 5G Network Slicing

Authors

  • Sroor Habeeb Mahmood Department of Computer Science, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq
  • Ali AL-ALLAWEE Department of Computer Science, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i4.16613

Keywords:

: 5G network slicing, resource allocation, Jain’s fairness index, max-min fairness, proportional fairness, Gini coefficient, Best Effort slice, QoS, Monte-Carlo simulation, ANOVA

Abstract

Network slicing is one of the main mechanisms used in 5G systems to let several service types operate over the same physical infrastructure. In this work, the shared system includes eMBB, URLLC, mMTC, and Best Effort slices, all competing for limited bandwidth and CPU capacity. Because the resource-allocation rule can change both fairness and service quality, this paper studies three policies under the same traffic conditions: Jain-based egalitarian allocation (JF), Max-Min Fairness (MMF), and Proportional Fairness (PF). A Python simulator is used to apply each policy separately to identical demand samples, after which the resulting allocations are evaluated using Jain’s Fairness Index (JFI) and the Gini coefficient. The traffic model follows a Poisson process with low, medium, and high load levels, and each case is repeated for 100 independent Monte-Carlo runs. In addition to fairness, the evaluation reports throughput, packet loss ratio, jitter, delay, bandwidth and CPU utilization, SLA satisfaction, and one-way ANOVA tests. The results show that JF gives perfect equality at all loads (JFI = 1.0, Gini = 0), although this equality reduces performance when the offered load is high. MMF is the strongest demand-aware fairness policy and provides the most balanced behavior under medium and high load. PF gives the lowest high-load jitter, but it also records the weakest SLA satisfaction (0.12). The ANOVA results indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) among the policies for most metrics in the medium- and high-load scenarios.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelmoneem, R. M., Abderrahim, B., & Eman, S. (2020). Mobility-aware task scheduling in cloud-fog IoT-based healthcare architectures. Computer Networks, 179, Article 107348.

Abualhaj, M., Al-Zyoud, M., Hiari, M., Alrabanah, Y., Anbar, M., Amer, A., & Al-Allawee, A. (2024). A fine-tuning of decision tree classifier for ransomware detection based on memory data. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 733–742.

Ahvar, E., Orgerie, A.-C., & Lebre, A. (2022). Estimating energy consumption of cloud, fog, and edge computing infrastructures. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, 7(2), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSUSC.2019.2905900

Al-Allawee, A., Lorenz, P., Abouaissa, A., & Abualhaj, M. (2023). A performance evaluation of in-memory databases operations in session initiation protocol. Network, 3(1), 1–14.

Al-Allawee, A., Mihoubi, M., Lorenz, P., & Abakar, K. S. (2023). Efficient dispatcher mechanism for SIP cluster based on memory utilization. In ICC 2023 – IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 3370–3375). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC45041.2023.10278652

Alanhdi, A., & Toka, L. (2024). A survey on integrating edge computing with AI and blockchain in maritime domain, aerial systems, IoT, and Industry 4.0. IEEE Access, 12, 28684–28709. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3367118

Amutha, B. (2023). IoT revolutionizing healthcare: A survey of smart healthcare system architectures. In 2023 International Conference on Research Methodologies in Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence and Telecommunication Engineering (RMKMATE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RMKMATE59243.2023.10369980

Anwesha, M., Shreya, G., Aabhas, B., Soumya, K., & Buyya, R. (2021). Internet of Health Things (IoHT) for personalized health care using integrated edge-fog-cloud network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 943–959.

Besher, K. M., OKidhain, I., Wick, L., & Ali, M. Z. (2022). Congestion control of healthcare packet routing in 5G edge computing networks. In 2022 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEET56468.2022.10007159

Bumgardner, C. (2016). OpenStack in action. Manning Publications.

Cao, K., Liu, Y., Meng, G., & Sun, Q. (2020). An overview on edge computing research. IEEE Access, 8, 85714–85728. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991734

De Donno, M., Tange, K., & Dragoni, N. (2019). Foundations and evolution of modern computing paradigms: Cloud, IoT, edge, and fog. IEEE Access, 7, 150936–150948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947652

Du, J., Zhang, G., Yuan, X., & Zang, X. (2024). P²SPA: Privacy preservation strategy with pseudo-addresses for edge computing networks. IEEE Access, 12, 40962–40972. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3377102

Hong, X., & Wang, Y. (2018). Edge computing technology: Development and countermeasures. Chinese Journal of Engineering Science, 20(2), 20.

Hosono, K., Maki, A., Watanabe, Y., Takada, H., & Sato, K. (2022). Implementation and evaluation of load balancing mechanism with multiple edge server cooperation for dynamic map system. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7), 7270–7280. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3067909

Jiang, L.-W., Li, Y.-J., Lin, L.-S., & Kao, C.-H. (2023). Sleep quality monitoring IoT-based healthcare system. In 2023 IEEE 5th Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare and Sustainability (ECBIOS) (pp. 92–95). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBIOS57802.2023.10218456

Kolhar, M., Abu-Alhaj, M. M., & Abd El-atty, S. M. (2017). Cloud data auditing techniques with a focus on privacy and security. IEEE Security & Privacy, 15(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.16

Mahmud, R., Koch, F. L., & Buyya, R. (2018). Cloud-fog interoperability in IoT-enabled healthcare solutions. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking (pp. 1–10).

Mpembele, A. B., Rogers, T., Ghosh, U., & Shetty, S. (2023). Communication-efficient and privacy-preserving edge-cloud framework for smart healthcare. In 2023 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (pp. 377–382). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCWkshps58843.2023.10464501

Nayyer, M. Z., et al. (2022). LBRO: Load balancing for resource optimization in edge computing. IEEE Access, 10, 97439–97449. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3205741

Praptodiyono, S., Firmansyah, T., Anwar, M. H., Wicaksana, C. A., Pramudyo, A. S., & Al-Allawee, A. (2023). Development of hybrid intrusion detection system based on Suricata with pfSense method for high reduction of DDoS attacks on IPv6 networks. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 125(9), 75–84.

Ren, J., Yu, G., He, Y., & Li, G. Y. (2019). Collaborative cloud and edge computing for latency minimization. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(5), 5031–5044. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2019.2904244

Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). The emergence of edge computing. Computer, 50(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.9

Shi, W. S., Zhang, X. Z., & Wang, Y. F. (2019). Edge computing: State-of-the-art and future directions. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 56(1), 1–21.

Shi, W., Sun, H., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., & Liu, W. (2017). Edge computing—An emerging computing model for the Internet of Everything era. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 54(5), 907–924.

VMTP. (2024, January 19). VMTP is a data path performance measurement tool for OpenStack clouds. https://vmtp.readthedocs.io/en/latest/readme.html

Wang, B., Wang, C., Huang, W., Song, Y., & Qin, X. (2020). A survey and taxonomy on task offloading for edge-cloud computing. IEEE Access, 8, 186080–186101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029649

Zhao, P., Yang, Z., & Zhang, G. (2024). Personalized and differential privacy-aware video stream offloading in mobile edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 12(1), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2024.3362355


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Mahmood , S. H. ., & AL-ALLAWEE, A. (2026). Fairness and QoS Comparison of Equal, Max-Min, and Demand-Proportional Allocation in 5G Network Slicing. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i4.16613