Academic Chatbot for Campus Information Services Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Authors

  • Haddad Alwi Yafie Telkom University
  • Achmad Udin Zailani Telkom University
  • Widang Muttaqin Telkom University
  • Muhammad Sheva Atallah Daffansyah Telkom University
  • Muhammad Rafi Ramzi Telkom University

DOI:

10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16088

Keywords:

Academic chatbot, academic services, answer evaluation, retrieval‑augmented generation, vector search

Abstract

University service centers handle many repetitive queries about academic schedules, registration, and policies stored in internal documents. Manual lookup is inefficient, and answers given by staff can be inconsistent. Rule-based chatbots only handle limited question patterns, while large language models are hard to update and may produce unsupported answers (hallucinations). This research designs an academic chatbot that combines document retrieval with answer generation so that each answer remains traceable to its source. The system extracts text from campus documents, segments it, encodes it using a multilingual embedding model, and stores it in a vector index for context retrieval. A response is generated through an instruction template that confines the output to the retrieved information and includes page references. Evaluation followed a mixed-method design: a quantitative layer measured retrieval quality (Precision@5, Recall@5) and generation quality using the four RAGAS sub-metrics (faithfulness, answer_relevancy, context_precision, context_recall) on a 100-question test set, while a qualitative layer applied thematic analysis to open-ended user comments. Statistical testing used McNemar's test for accuracy and a paired bootstrap (10,000 resamples) for retrieval metrics; 95% confidence intervals are reported. Results: the proposed RAG system achieved 84% answer accuracy (95% CI 76–90%), Precision@5 = 0.80 and Recall@5 = 0.72, with a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 78 and a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of +32 from 30 participants. Differences in accuracy versus the lexical and LLM-only baselines were statistically significant (McNemar p < 0.05). The system offers a replicable instantiation of RAG for transparent, citation-backed campus information services in Indonesian.

GS Cited Analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baur, D., Ansorg, J., Heyde, C.-E., & Voelker, A. (2025). Development and evaluation of a retrieval-augmented generation chatbot for orthopedic patient education: mixed-methods study. JMIR AI, 4(1), e75262.

Christianto, D., Siswanto, E., & Chaniago, R. (2016). Penggunaan Named Entity Recognition dan Artificial Intelligence Markup Language untuk Penerapan Chatbot Berbasis Teks. Jurnal Telematika, 10(2), 143–148.

Favero, N., Salute, F., & Hardt, D. (2025). Advancing academic chatbots: Evaluation of non-traditional outputs (Comparing Graph RAG vs. Advanced RAG). arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.00991.

Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., & Sun, H. (2023). Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997.

Gupta, S., Ranjan, R., & Singh, S. N. (2024). A comprehensive survey of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): evolution, current landscape and future directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12837.

Hayrapetyan, L. (2026). Label-free evaluation of retrieval-augmented generation in a university policy chatbot. Proceedings of the ACM Student Research Competition.

Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38.

Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33 (pp. 9459–9474).

Liu, W., Trenous, S., Ribeiro, L. F. R., Byrne, B., & Hieber, F. (2025). XRAG: Cross-lingual retrieval-augmented generation. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 (pp. 15669–15690).

Litschko, R., Vulić, I., Ponzetto, S. P., & Glavaš, G. (2022). On cross-lingual retrieval with multilingual text encoders. Information Retrieval, 25(2), 149–183.

Murtiyoso, M., Tahyudin, I., & Berlilana, S. (2025). A systematic review of retrieval-augmented generation for enhancing domain-specific knowledge in large language models. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(2), 1–10.

Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100033.

Pinecone. (2024). RAG evaluation: do not let customers tell you first. Retrieved from Pinecone blog (accessed 2024).

Shahul Es, S., James, J., Espinosa-Anke, L., & Schockaert, S. (2023). RAGAS: Automated evaluation of retrieval augmented generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15217.

Salman, M. D., Rahmaddeni, Nasution, T., & Susanti, S. (2026). Implementation of retrieval-augmented generation method on large language model for development of campus service and information chatbot. INOVTEK Polbeng – Seri Informatika, 11(1), 298–309.

Sentence-Transformers. (2023). Multilingual sentence embeddings: paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2. Retrieved from SBERT.net documentation.

Shorten, E., & Shorten, C. (2023). An overview of RAG evaluation. Weaviate Blog. Retrieved from weaviate.io (accessed 2023).

Shorten, E., & Shorten, C. (2025). Evaluating answer quality in RAG systems: precision, recall, and faithfulness. CobbAI Blog. Retrieved from cobbai.com (accessed 2025).

Singh, S. U., & Namin, A. S. (2025). A survey on chatbots and large language models: testing and evaluation techniques. Natural Language Processing Journal, 9, 100128.

Swacha, J., & Gracel, M. (2025). Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) chatbots for education: A survey of applications. Applied Sciences, 15(8), 4234.

Wu, S., Xiong, Y., Cui, Y., Wu, H., Chen, C., Yuan, Y., & Xue, C. J. (2024). Retrieval-augmented generation for natural language processing: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13193.

Yu, H., Gan, A., Zhang, K., Tong, S., Liu, Q., & Liu, Z. (2025). Evaluation of retrieval-augmented generation: A survey. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Big Data (pp. 102–120).

Husain, M. L., Wibisono, Y., & Anisyah, A. (2025). Development of an academic services chatbot based on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 5(2), 727–735. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v5i2.6719

Downloads


Crossmark Updates

How to Cite

Yafie, H. A. ., Zailani, A. U., Muttaqin , W., Daffansyah , M. S. A., & Ramzi, M. R. . (2026). Academic Chatbot for Campus Information Services Using Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 10(3), 1330-1339. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16088