Assessing Information System Acquisition and Implementation Using COBIT 4.1 in Housing Developers
DOI:
10.33395/sinkron.v10i3.16039Keywords:
Acquire and Implement (AI); COBIT 4.1; Maturity Level; Financial Information System; Property Developer CompanyAbstract
Housing development companies plan, construct, and market housing. As technology advances, information systems become crucial, especially in financial matters. However, no comprehensive analysis of financial information system implementation in this sector exists. This study employed a qualitative descriptive approach supported by quantitative assessment (mixed-method), combining observations and semi-structured interviews (qualitative) with a questionnaire-based maturity level calculation (quantitative). Data were collected from three respondents (Finance Manager, IT Staff, and Accounting Staff) directly involved in the system. The maturity level was determined using the COBIT 4.1 framework in the Acquire and Implement (AI) domain. Results show an average maturity of 3.08 Level 3 (Defined Process), meaning procedures are documented and structured. However, several subdomains remain below target AI5 gap 1.30 and AI7 gap 1.10 require improved implementation and control of financial information systems, while AI3 has the smallest gap (0.02). This study contributes to the academic community by (1) providing a detailed assessment of financial information system implementation in housing development companies, (2) identifying maturity gaps in each AI subdomain, and (3) offering practical recommendations for improving IT governance maturity. Routine maintenance, system monitoring, and infrastructure updates are still needed to ensure system stability. Overall, information systems management has not yet reached the targeted maturity level due to reliance on individuals, lack of formal training, and poor procedure communication. Continuous improvement is required to make information systems management more efficient and scalable.
Downloads
References
Al Huda, H., & Syahrudin, M. (2024). Analisis Audit Sistem Informasi Perpustakaan Sekolah Sman2 Tembilahan Menggunakan Cobit Framework. TEKNOFILE : Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 11(9), 2478–2483.
Alzeban, A., Al-Hajaya, K., & Sawan, N. (2026). The Quality of Cybersecurity Audits: Do Synergies among the Chief Audit Executive, IT Governance, and Internal Audit Functions Matter? Dr Abdulaziz Alzeban Professor in Accounting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 41(2), 322–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2025-4825
Belelang, B., & Nurlela, S. (2022). Penggunaan COBIT 4.1 Untuk Audit Sistem Informasi Kepegawaian Pada PT. Mustika Agung Sentosa. INSANtek – Jurnal Inovasi Dan Sains Teknik Elektro, 3(2), 67–72. http://jurnal.bsi.ac.id/index.php/insantek67
Fadli, Z. A., & Nugroho, D. B. (2025). Development of Knowledge Base of Audit Process in High-Rise Building Works with Design-Build Contract Based on ISO 19011:2018 and Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Housing No. 10 of 2021. Journal of Project Management & Construction, 1(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7454/jpmc.v1i1.1004
Gustianto, H., & Wanda, S. S. (2026). Implementasi sistem pengolahan anggaran dana bop pada sdn kramat jati 19 pagi berbasis java. Idealis: Indonesian Journal Information System, 9, 75–89.
Imtihan, K., Rodi, M., Ashari, M., Zaen, M. T. A., & Marzuki, K. (2022). Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Framework Cobit 4.1. MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 21(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v21i2.1569
ISACA. (2019). COBIT: Framework, control objectives, management guidelines, maturity models. https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit
Juniar Wibowo, Y., Dharmawan, A., & Wahyuni, A. (2025). Audit Sistem Akademik Terhadap Akurasi Data Mahasiswa Universitas XXX dengan Framework COBIT 4.1. Jurnal Algoritma, 22(2), 2157–2168. https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.22-2.2629
Lowry, M. R., Lowry, P. B., Chatterjee, S. S., Moody, G. D., & Richardson, V. J. (2024). Achieving strategic alignment between business and information technology with information technology governance : the role of commitment to principles and Top Leadership Support ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY. European Journal of Information Systems, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2024.2390998
Mangunsong, I. B. M., & Irawan, M. D. (2025). Implementation of Topsis Method in Supplier Selection System With Rapid Application Development. IDEALIS : Indonesian JournaL Information System, 8(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.36080/idealis.v8i1.3361
Muhamad, A., & Supriadi, R. (2024). Audit sistem informasi pada dinas perpustakaan dan kearsipan kabupaten indragiri hilir menggunakan framework COBIT 4.1 domain monitor and evaluate. TEKNOFILE : Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 2(9), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.15643/swipc-2024-19
Nurbojatmiko, N., Irahman, M. S., Nashikha, A., & Ramadhan, R. L. (2024). Information Security Evaluation of Data Centre Architecture Using COBIT 5. Sinkron, 9(1), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13224
Nurfadhiilah, A., Faharuddin, F., & Jumaryadi, Y. (2024). Analisa Audit Sistem Informasi Tata Kelola TI menggunakan Framework COBIT 4.1 dengan mengukur Tingkat Maturity Level. SISTEMASI: Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 13(2), 412–419. http://sistemasi.ftik.unisi.ac.id
Purnama Adji, G., Ispandi, Sudradjat, A., Ramadan, R., & Suhardjono, S. (2022). Audit Sistem Informasi Menggunakan Framework COBIT 4.1 Pada Badan Kependudukan dan Keluarga Berencana Nasional. Informatics for Educators and Professionals, 7(1), 15–26.
Roosinda, F. W., Lestari, N. S., Utama, A. A. G. S., Anisah, H. U., Siahaan, A. L. S., Islamiati, S. H. D., Astiti, K. A., Hikmah, N., & Fasa, M. I. F. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Zahir Publishing.
Saryoko, A., Junaidi, A., Dalis, S., & Rivaldy, F. (2021). Tata Kelola Sistem Informasi PT. Maspion Menggunakan Framework Cobit 4.1 Domain Acquire And Implement. Paradigma - Jurnal Komputer Dan Informatika, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.31294/p.v23i2.11419
Sembiring, J. M. E. B., Hudoyo, M., Manik, E. D. B., & Sinaga, G. T. B. (2025). Audit sistem informasi dalam menilai keandalan sistem keuangan digital. Yayasan Literasi Emas Nusantara, 02(03), 18–26.
Siddik, M. K., Novriyanto, N., Vitriani, Y., & Darmizal, T. (2024). Audit Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Pada Universitas Hang Tuah Pada Domain Deliver and Support COBIT 4.1. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 4(3), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v4i3.1299
Sinaga, R., & Permana, I. (2023). Audit Sistem Informasi Terhadap PT Enseval Menggunakan COBIT 4.1 Domain Acquire and Implement. Seminar Nasional Riset Dan Inovasi Teknologi (SEMNAS RISTEK).
Trinanda, F. A., Hidayatullah, W., Wibowo, A. H., Permana, A. D., Pratama, A. K., Phumi, L. F., & Mukaromah, S. (2024). Audit sistem informasi dengan kerangka kerja cobit 4.1 untuk evaluasi manajemen teknologi informasi di fakultas ilmu komputer (UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur). Jurnal Nasional Teknologi Komputer, 4(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.61306/jnastek.v4i2.122
Wahidah, R. N., Lutfiyana, N., Ramadanti, V. F., Septiyo, P., & Drefiyanto, R. (2022). Audit Sistem Informasi Absensi Mesin Fingerprint Pada Pt. Metal Castindo Industritama Dengan Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Stmik Antar Bangsa, XI(02), 51–57.
Downloads
|
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dea Ramadhan, Hilyah Magdalena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Muhammad Khoiruddin harahap
Google Scholar 
Moraref
PKP Index
Garuda Kemdikbud
Indonesia OneSearch
OCLC Worldcat
Dimensions
Index Copernicus
Scilit
